verdantia.
Agri-Food Vulnerability IndexResearch snapshot · not a live alert
All countries / Country profile

Suriname

Follow the food-system dependencies and response capacity behind the score. Explore 2014–2023, one year at a time.

Headline snapshot: all seven indicators weighted equally, averaged across 20 filled-in datasets.

Compare this country
Composite score in 20230.3210–1 · higher is more vulnerable
World rank#93Of 178 countries · rank 1 is most vulnerable
Food-basket import dependency64.7%Calorie-weighted dependency profile

A decade in context

Suriname
0.000.250.500.751.002014201520162017201820192020202120222023Suriname, 2014: 0.377Suriname, 2015: 0.355Suriname, 2016: 0.331Suriname, 2017: 0.321Suriname, 2018: 0.329Suriname, 2019: 0.323Suriname, 2020: 0.321Suriname, 2021: 0.338Suriname, 2022: 0.314Suriname, 2023: 0.321

Higher means more vulnerable. All countries share the same 0–1 scale. Shading shows the range across 20 imputations, not a confidence interval.

View exact chart values
YearSuriname
20140.3770.377–0.377
20150.3550.355–0.355
20160.3310.331–0.331
20170.3210.321–0.321
20180.3290.329–0.329
20190.3230.323–0.323
20200.3210.321–0.321
20210.3380.338–0.338
20220.3140.314–0.314
20230.3210.321–0.321

The seven indicators in 2023

Bars use direction-adjusted normalized values: longer always means more vulnerable. Values beside titles retain published units; raw and normalized fields may reflect different imputation stages.

Food import burden

9.0%

Food imports as a percentage of merchandise exports. Source observations are three-year averages; 100% is the scoring saturation threshold.

Production concentration

2,697

Concentration of domestic production by tonnes. Heavy products can dominate this provisional measure.

Climate exposure

0.624

Normalized cereal-yield and population projections. This projection-based component is largely constant over the study window, not annual weather.

Adaptive capacity

0.330

ND-GAIN readiness. Higher is better: stronger capacity to respond to a shock. Darker shading indicates lower readiness.

Behind the import-dependency figure

The score uses bounded dependency values. These additional measures retain the underlying trade picture.

Gross dependency, uncapped
64.8%
Can exceed 100% for processing or re-export hubs.
Net import dependency
53.4%
Imports minus exports, relative to domestic supply; negative for net exporters.
Self-sufficiency ratio
46.6%
Basket-weighted domestic production relative to supply.
Calorie coverage
97.5%
Share of basket calories with usable dependency ratios; standalone IDR ranking requires at least 80%.

Built for open inquiry.

Research context: Raghvendra Singh, TU München, BSc Management & Data Science.

This is academic context, not university endorsement. The research snapshot is presented separately from Verdantia’s current solo-founder company status.

Suggested citation: Mandawewala, S., Singh, R., and Doan, B. See the full source and citation details ↗

Read the research limitations ↗

Source: CEPII, BACI HS12 (V202601). Etalab Open Licence 2.0.

Source: FAO. FAOSTAT (Food Balance Sheets / Food Security), 2026. Licence CC BY 4.0. FAO does not endorse any products or services.

Source: University of Notre Dame, ND-GAIN Country Index, 2026 edition. CC BY 3.0.