verdantia.
Agri-Food Vulnerability IndexResearch snapshot · not a live alert
All countries / Country profile

Pakistan

Follow the food-system dependencies and response capacity behind the score. Explore 2014–2023, one year at a time.

Headline snapshot: all seven indicators weighted equally, averaged across 20 filled-in datasets.

Compare this country
Composite score in 20230.2430–1 · higher is more vulnerable
World rank#141Of 178 countries · rank 1 is most vulnerable
Food-basket import dependency16.8%Calorie-weighted dependency profile

A decade in context

Pakistan
0.000.250.500.751.002014201520162017201820192020202120222023Pakistan, 2014: 0.206Pakistan, 2015: 0.220Pakistan, 2016: 0.231Pakistan, 2017: 0.221Pakistan, 2018: 0.216Pakistan, 2019: 0.217Pakistan, 2020: 0.240Pakistan, 2021: 0.252Pakistan, 2022: 0.232Pakistan, 2023: 0.243

Higher means more vulnerable. All countries share the same 0–1 scale. Shading shows the range across 20 imputations, not a confidence interval.

View exact chart values
YearPakistan
20140.2060.206–0.206
20150.2200.220–0.220
20160.2310.231–0.231
20170.2210.221–0.221
20180.2160.216–0.216
20190.2170.217–0.217
20200.2400.240–0.240
20210.2520.252–0.252
20220.2320.232–0.232
20230.2430.243–0.243

The seven indicators in 2023

Bars use direction-adjusted normalized values: longer always means more vulnerable. Values beside titles retain published units; raw and normalized fields may reflect different imputation stages.

Food import burden

30.0%

Food imports as a percentage of merchandise exports. Source observations are three-year averages; 100% is the scoring saturation threshold.

Production concentration

1,995

Concentration of domestic production by tonnes. Heavy products can dominate this provisional measure.

Climate exposure

0.751

Normalized cereal-yield and population projections. This projection-based component is largely constant over the study window, not annual weather.

Adaptive capacity

0.300

ND-GAIN readiness. Higher is better: stronger capacity to respond to a shock. Darker shading indicates lower readiness.

Behind the import-dependency figure

The score uses bounded dependency values. These additional measures retain the underlying trade picture.

Gross dependency, uncapped
16.8%
Can exceed 100% for processing or re-export hubs.
Net import dependency
12.9%
Imports minus exports, relative to domestic supply; negative for net exporters.
Self-sufficiency ratio
87.1%
Basket-weighted domestic production relative to supply.
Calorie coverage
100.0%
Share of basket calories with usable dependency ratios; standalone IDR ranking requires at least 80%.

Built for open inquiry.

Research context: Raghvendra Singh, TU München, BSc Management & Data Science.

This is academic context, not university endorsement. The research snapshot is presented separately from Verdantia’s current solo-founder company status.

Suggested citation: Mandawewala, S., Singh, R., and Doan, B. See the full source and citation details ↗

Read the research limitations ↗

Source: CEPII, BACI HS12 (V202601). Etalab Open Licence 2.0.

Source: FAO. FAOSTAT (Food Balance Sheets / Food Security), 2026. Licence CC BY 4.0. FAO does not endorse any products or services.

Source: University of Notre Dame, ND-GAIN Country Index, 2026 edition. CC BY 3.0.