verdantia.
Agri-Food Vulnerability IndexResearch snapshot · not a live alert
All countries / Country profile

Gambia

Follow the food-system dependencies and response capacity behind the score. Explore 2014–2023, one year at a time.

Headline snapshot: all seven indicators weighted equally, averaged across 20 filled-in datasets.

Compare this country
Composite score in 20230.5210–1 · higher is more vulnerable
World rank#16Of 178 countries · rank 1 is most vulnerable
Food-basket import dependency81.1%Calorie-weighted dependency profile

A decade in context

Gambia
0.000.250.500.751.002014201520162017201820192020202120222023Gambia, 2014: 0.516Gambia, 2015: 0.504Gambia, 2016: 0.520Gambia, 2017: 0.510Gambia, 2018: 0.533Gambia, 2019: 0.509Gambia, 2020: 0.546Gambia, 2021: 0.534Gambia, 2022: 0.518Gambia, 2023: 0.521

Higher means more vulnerable. All countries share the same 0–1 scale. Shading shows the range across 20 imputations, not a confidence interval.

View exact chart values
YearGambia
20140.5160.516–0.516
20150.5040.504–0.504
20160.5200.520–0.520
20170.5100.510–0.510
20180.5330.533–0.533
20190.5090.509–0.509
20200.5460.546–0.546
20210.5340.534–0.534
20220.5180.518–0.518
20230.5210.521–0.521

The seven indicators in 2023

Bars use direction-adjusted normalized values: longer always means more vulnerable. Values beside titles retain published units; raw and normalized fields may reflect different imputation stages.

Food import burden

443.0%

Food imports as a percentage of merchandise exports. Source observations are three-year averages; 100% is the scoring saturation threshold.

Production concentration

745

Concentration of domestic production by tonnes. Heavy products can dominate this provisional measure.

Climate exposure

0.979

Normalized cereal-yield and population projections. This projection-based component is largely constant over the study window, not annual weather.

Adaptive capacity

0.330

ND-GAIN readiness. Higher is better: stronger capacity to respond to a shock. Darker shading indicates lower readiness.

Behind the import-dependency figure

The score uses bounded dependency values. These additional measures retain the underlying trade picture.

Gross dependency, uncapped
81.7%
Can exceed 100% for processing or re-export hubs.
Net import dependency
80.1%
Imports minus exports, relative to domestic supply; negative for net exporters.
Self-sufficiency ratio
19.9%
Basket-weighted domestic production relative to supply.
Calorie coverage
99.2%
Share of basket calories with usable dependency ratios; standalone IDR ranking requires at least 80%.

Built for open inquiry.

Research context: Raghvendra Singh, TU München, BSc Management & Data Science.

This is academic context, not university endorsement. The research snapshot is presented separately from Verdantia’s current solo-founder company status.

Suggested citation: Mandawewala, S., Singh, R., and Doan, B. See the full source and citation details ↗

Read the research limitations ↗

Source: CEPII, BACI HS12 (V202601). Etalab Open Licence 2.0.

Source: FAO. FAOSTAT (Food Balance Sheets / Food Security), 2026. Licence CC BY 4.0. FAO does not endorse any products or services.

Source: University of Notre Dame, ND-GAIN Country Index, 2026 edition. CC BY 3.0.