verdantia.
Agri-Food Vulnerability IndexResearch snapshot · not a live alert
All countries / Country profile

Sweden

Follow the food-system dependencies and response capacity behind the score. Explore 2014–2023, one year at a time.

Headline snapshot: all seven indicators weighted equally, averaged across 20 filled-in datasets.

Compare this country
Composite score in 20230.1960–1 · higher is more vulnerable
World rank#161Of 178 countries · rank 1 is most vulnerable
Food-basket import dependency53.1%Calorie-weighted dependency profile

A decade in context

Sweden
0.000.250.500.751.002014201520162017201820192020202120222023Sweden, 2014: 0.182Sweden, 2015: 0.183Sweden, 2016: 0.187Sweden, 2017: 0.183Sweden, 2018: 0.205Sweden, 2019: 0.187Sweden, 2020: 0.184Sweden, 2021: 0.186Sweden, 2022: 0.186Sweden, 2023: 0.196

Higher means more vulnerable. All countries share the same 0–1 scale. Shading shows the range across 20 imputations, not a confidence interval.

View exact chart values
YearSweden
20140.1820.182–0.182
20150.1830.183–0.183
20160.1870.187–0.187
20170.1830.183–0.183
20180.2050.205–0.205
20190.1870.187–0.187
20200.1840.184–0.184
20210.1860.186–0.186
20220.1860.186–0.186
20230.1960.196–0.196

The seven indicators in 2023

Bars use direction-adjusted normalized values: longer always means more vulnerable. Values beside titles retain published units; raw and normalized fields may reflect different imputation stages.

Food import burden

7.0%

Food imports as a percentage of merchandise exports. Source observations are three-year averages; 100% is the scoring saturation threshold.

Production concentration

1,269

Concentration of domestic production by tonnes. Heavy products can dominate this provisional measure.

Climate exposure

0.133

Normalized cereal-yield and population projections. This projection-based component is largely constant over the study window, not annual weather.

Adaptive capacity

0.710

ND-GAIN readiness. Higher is better: stronger capacity to respond to a shock. Darker shading indicates lower readiness.

Behind the import-dependency figure

The score uses bounded dependency values. These additional measures retain the underlying trade picture.

Gross dependency, uncapped
62.8%
Can exceed 100% for processing or re-export hubs.
Net import dependency
33.8%
Imports minus exports, relative to domestic supply; negative for net exporters.
Self-sufficiency ratio
66.2%
Basket-weighted domestic production relative to supply.
Calorie coverage
99.9%
Share of basket calories with usable dependency ratios; standalone IDR ranking requires at least 80%.

Built for open inquiry.

Research context: Raghvendra Singh, TU München, BSc Management & Data Science.

This is academic context, not university endorsement. The research snapshot is presented separately from Verdantia’s current solo-founder company status.

Suggested citation: Mandawewala, S., Singh, R., and Doan, B. See the full source and citation details ↗

Read the research limitations ↗

Source: CEPII, BACI HS12 (V202601). Etalab Open Licence 2.0.

Source: FAO. FAOSTAT (Food Balance Sheets / Food Security), 2026. Licence CC BY 4.0. FAO does not endorse any products or services.

Source: University of Notre Dame, ND-GAIN Country Index, 2026 edition. CC BY 3.0.