verdantia.
Agri-Food Vulnerability IndexResearch snapshot · not a live alert
All countries / Country profile

El Salvador

Follow the food-system dependencies and response capacity behind the score. Explore 2014–2023, one year at a time.

Headline snapshot: all seven indicators weighted equally, averaged across 20 filled-in datasets.

Compare this country
Composite score in 20230.4640–1 · higher is more vulnerable
World rank#27Of 178 countries · rank 1 is most vulnerable
Food-basket import dependency56.6%Calorie-weighted dependency profile

A decade in context

El Salvador
0.000.250.500.751.002014201520162017201820192020202120222023El Salvador, 2014: 0.434El Salvador, 2015: 0.457El Salvador, 2016: 0.451El Salvador, 2017: 0.444El Salvador, 2018: 0.456El Salvador, 2019: 0.480El Salvador, 2020: 0.462El Salvador, 2021: 0.473El Salvador, 2022: 0.479El Salvador, 2023: 0.464

Higher means more vulnerable. All countries share the same 0–1 scale. Shading shows the range across 20 imputations, not a confidence interval.

View exact chart values
YearEl Salvador
20140.4340.434–0.434
20150.4570.457–0.457
20160.4510.451–0.451
20170.4440.444–0.444
20180.4560.456–0.456
20190.4800.480–0.480
20200.4620.462–0.462
20210.4730.473–0.473
20220.4790.479–0.479
20230.4640.464–0.464

The seven indicators in 2023

Bars use direction-adjusted normalized values: longer always means more vulnerable. Values beside titles retain published units; raw and normalized fields may reflect different imputation stages.

Food import burden

39.0%

Food imports as a percentage of merchandise exports. Source observations are three-year averages; 100% is the scoring saturation threshold.

Production concentration

4,488

Concentration of domestic production by tonnes. Heavy products can dominate this provisional measure.

Climate exposure

0.586

Normalized cereal-yield and population projections. This projection-based component is largely constant over the study window, not annual weather.

Adaptive capacity

0.350

ND-GAIN readiness. Higher is better: stronger capacity to respond to a shock. Darker shading indicates lower readiness.

Behind the import-dependency figure

The score uses bounded dependency values. These additional measures retain the underlying trade picture.

Gross dependency, uncapped
69.0%
Can exceed 100% for processing or re-export hubs.
Net import dependency
14.7%
Imports minus exports, relative to domestic supply; negative for net exporters.
Self-sufficiency ratio
85.3%
Basket-weighted domestic production relative to supply.
Calorie coverage
99.9%
Share of basket calories with usable dependency ratios; standalone IDR ranking requires at least 80%.

Built for open inquiry.

Research context: Raghvendra Singh, TU München, BSc Management & Data Science.

This is academic context, not university endorsement. The research snapshot is presented separately from Verdantia’s current solo-founder company status.

Suggested citation: Mandawewala, S., Singh, R., and Doan, B. See the full source and citation details ↗

Read the research limitations ↗

Source: CEPII, BACI HS12 (V202601). Etalab Open Licence 2.0.

Source: FAO. FAOSTAT (Food Balance Sheets / Food Security), 2026. Licence CC BY 4.0. FAO does not endorse any products or services.

Source: University of Notre Dame, ND-GAIN Country Index, 2026 edition. CC BY 3.0.