verdantia.
Agri-Food Vulnerability IndexResearch snapshot · not a live alert
All countries / Country profile

Norway

Follow the food-system dependencies and response capacity behind the score. Explore 2014–2023, one year at a time.

Headline snapshot: all seven indicators weighted equally, averaged across 20 filled-in datasets.

Compare this country
Composite score in 20230.1880–1 · higher is more vulnerable
World rank#164Of 178 countries · rank 1 is most vulnerable
Food-basket import dependency68.8%Calorie-weighted dependency profile

A decade in context

Norway
0.000.250.500.751.002014201520162017201820192020202120222023Norway, 2014: 0.197Norway, 2015: 0.198Norway, 2016: 0.196Norway, 2017: 0.198Norway, 2018: 0.203Norway, 2019: 0.201Norway, 2020: 0.194Norway, 2021: 0.191Norway, 2022: 0.184Norway, 2023: 0.188

Higher means more vulnerable. All countries share the same 0–1 scale. Shading shows the range across 20 imputations, not a confidence interval.

View exact chart values
YearNorway
20140.1970.197–0.197
20150.1980.198–0.198
20160.1960.196–0.196
20170.1980.198–0.198
20180.2030.203–0.203
20190.2010.201–0.201
20200.1940.194–0.194
20210.1910.191–0.191
20220.1840.184–0.184
20230.1880.188–0.188

The seven indicators in 2023

Bars use direction-adjusted normalized values: longer always means more vulnerable. Values beside titles retain published units; raw and normalized fields may reflect different imputation stages.

Food import burden

3.0%

Food imports as a percentage of merchandise exports. Source observations are three-year averages; 100% is the scoring saturation threshold.

Production concentration

1,167

Concentration of domestic production by tonnes. Heavy products can dominate this provisional measure.

Climate exposure

0.157

Normalized cereal-yield and population projections. This projection-based component is largely constant over the study window, not annual weather.

Adaptive capacity

0.760

ND-GAIN readiness. Higher is better: stronger capacity to respond to a shock. Darker shading indicates lower readiness.

Behind the import-dependency figure

The score uses bounded dependency values. These additional measures retain the underlying trade picture.

Gross dependency, uncapped
70.5%
Can exceed 100% for processing or re-export hubs.
Net import dependency
22.0%
Imports minus exports, relative to domestic supply; negative for net exporters.
Self-sufficiency ratio
78.0%
Basket-weighted domestic production relative to supply.
Calorie coverage
100.0%
Share of basket calories with usable dependency ratios; standalone IDR ranking requires at least 80%.

Built for open inquiry.

Research context: Raghvendra Singh, TU München, BSc Management & Data Science.

This is academic context, not university endorsement. The research snapshot is presented separately from Verdantia’s current solo-founder company status.

Suggested citation: Mandawewala, S., Singh, R., and Doan, B. See the full source and citation details ↗

Read the research limitations ↗

Source: CEPII, BACI HS12 (V202601). Etalab Open Licence 2.0.

Source: FAO. FAOSTAT (Food Balance Sheets / Food Security), 2026. Licence CC BY 4.0. FAO does not endorse any products or services.

Source: University of Notre Dame, ND-GAIN Country Index, 2026 edition. CC BY 3.0.